Compared on repository metadata · updated 2 November 2026
decider-2b-vision vs open-jev-deberta-v3-large
Both are decision models. What separates them is licence, architecture, size and whether anyone has checked the numbers. Only one of those is a matter of opinion.
Side by side
Rows marked with a dot are where the two genuinely differ. Everything here comes from each repository’s own metadata, read on 2 November 2026.
| Dimension | decider-2b-vision | open-jev-deberta-v3-large |
|---|---|---|
| Published by | Mapika | com-kotobalabs |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B-Base | microsoft/deberta-v3-large |
| Architecture | Decoder | Encoder |
| Parameters | 2.2B | 434M |
| Local formats | Original weights only | Original weights only |
| Measured by us | No | No |
| Attention | 2,018 downloads, 35 likes | 1,108 downloads, 74 likes |
What actually separates them
They produce their confidence differently
open-jev-deberta-v3-large is an encoder and decider-2b-vision is a decoder. An encoder scores every option in one forward pass, so the probability it returns is defined over the whole option set by construction. A decoder reaches an answer by generating, so a usable probability needs constrained decoding plus a normalisation step over the options. Two decoders can report incomparable confidences while both being honest. That difference is invisible in an accuracy number and decisive if you intend to route on confidence.
open-jev-deberta-v3-large is 5.1 times smaller
434M against 2.2B. At high volume that gap shows up as cost and latency long before it shows up as accuracy, so the question is whether the larger one earns the difference on your decisions.
Neither has been measured by anyone independent
Both are days old and every figure in circulation about either was published by the people who trained it. The table above is what can be checked from repository metadata. Everything else about these two is currently unknown.
Settle it on your traffic
This page narrows the choice to the rows that matter. A private benchmark runs decider-2b-vision and open-jev-deberta-v3-large on a frozen set of your own historical decisions and returns accuracy at every coverage level, so you can see which one clears your error budget.
Related comparisons
agent-jev vs open-jev-deberta-v3-large
598M · decoder · apache-2.0
cua-s1-forms vs decider-2b-vision
mit
cua-s1-forms vs open-jev-deberta-v3-large
mit
decider-2b-vision vs JEV-CPU
2.2B · decoder · apache-2.0
decider-2b-vision vs laya
2.2B · decoder · apache-2.0
decider-2b-vision vs laya-multilingual
2.2B · decoder · apache-2.0
Find out what your data actually supports
We turn your historical decisions into a frozen test set, then tell you which model, which threshold, and how much of it you can safely automate.