Compared on repository metadata · 20 September 2026

Jev vs cua-s1-forms

Both are decision models. What separates them is licence, architecture, size and whether anyone has checked the numbers. Only one of those is a matter of opinion.

Side by side

Rows marked with a dot are where the two genuinely differ. Everything here comes from each repository’s own metadata, read on 20 September 2026.

DimensionJevcua-s1-forms
Published byTypeSafecua-ai
WeightsHosted onlyOpen
LicenceProprietarymit
Base modelNot disclosedNot disclosed
ArchitectureNot disclosedNot disclosed
ParametersNot disclosedNot disclosed
Local formatsOriginal weights onlyOriginal weights only
Measured by usYesNo
AttentionNot on Hugging Face82 likes

What actually separates them

  1. The licence decides this one before any benchmark does

    Jev is licensed Proprietary, which is not a commercial licence. If this is going into a product, cua-s1-forms is the only one of the two you can ship, and no accuracy figure changes that.

  2. One you run, one you call

    Jev is a hosted API: no weights to operate, but a key, a network round trip and a vendor version number in the path of every decision. cua-s1-forms is yours to run, which removes all three and hands you the operational cost instead.

  3. One has been measured and one has not

    We ran Jev on a frozen 2,000-decision split and published accuracy, calibration and a risk and coverage curve. Nobody outside its own authors has published anything comparable for cua-s1-forms. That is a gap in the evidence, not a verdict about the model.

What this page cannot tell you

Which one is more accurate on your traffic. Nothing above is a benchmark result, because for cua-s1-forms no independent benchmark exists. A comparison built from metadata narrows a shortlist. It does not close it. That takes your own data.

Find out what your data actually supports

We turn your historical decisions into a frozen test set, then tell you which model, which threshold, and how much of it you can safely automate.